Skip to main content

My Naltrexone honeymoon.

Reading around the C Three Foundation forum "Options Save Lives" has made me realise that I am not actually an "early responder" but I am in the honeymoon phase. 

From what I can understand, in the early stages the Naltrexone has the upper hand but after a couple of weeks, the brain will fight back wanting its fix and that's when I may see an increase in the cravings.  I'm going to ride with it.   Until then, I'll continue as I have been and won't force an alcohol free day because there's really no point until I experience the "fight for the fix". Then I'll know what I'm in for! 

Here is information from C3 regarding the Honeymoon phase...
 
"It's like the term 'Quick Responders' or 'Early Responders'. This is something that we at C3 are working on clarifying for people. We have seen people on this forum notice an immediate reduction and call themselves a quick/early responder, without realising that they are not responding to the treatment of TSM because it doesn't work this fast, they are simply experiencing the initial first-drink blocking effects of the medication which the brain soon adjusts to - hence the honeymoon period. The curative treatment of TSM is something that happens over months, not days or weeks. Nearly everyone gets this honeymoon period and bringing their hopes up of a quick recovery by saying they must be an early responder can really set them up for disappointment when they find it was the initial medication effects and that is all.

I would personally call a Quick Responder as someone who reaches extinction well before the usual 6-8 month range that we find in real-life. If someone has their cravings extinguished at the 3 month mark, for example, then great! They were an early responder to naltrexone. If someone experiences a drastic reduction in the first couple of weeks, then this is more likely just to be an effect of the medication itself, rather than the curative result of it."


Yesterday I had my 3rd full dose of Naltrexone (no side effects) at 4pm. I made a drink around 5.45pm and it was just the same feeling...nothing but scotch and soda taste and no zing. I tried very hard to do mindful drinking in between preparing dinner. I wasn't triggered to drink unless I saw the glass on the kitchen counter but when I did, I made sure to stop what I was doing and focus solely on the sip of drink and on the lack of sensation it had. 

When the drink was finished, I toyed briefly with pouring another but reminded myself how much better I'm feeling without more alcohol. I immediately poured a soda water with sugar free cordial so I could move on.

Removing the buzz is fascinating. Without it there and without its urge to have another, another, another...I can now feel the effects of the alcohol (and I'm not sure I particularly enjoy it). It makes me realise that my need for the buzz was overshadowing or disguising the actual effects of the alcohol.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Overdrinking and desperately looking for a solution to reduce my intake.

By mid-July 2017 I had to be honest with myself.  I had a problem with alcohol. It was hard to link the words "problem with alcohol" with how I presented myself to society.  I'm a respectable person - a successful small business owner, designer, mother, wife, somewhat of a high-achiever, always on the go, creative, stylish, well presented.  How did this happen to me? What caused me to start hiding the amount I drank (from my husband), waiting for him to leave the room so I could sneak another drink without him knowing.  Why did I clock watch for 5.30pm to come around so I could pour a drink?  And get agitated if I couldn't have one at the regular time. Was I alone in this?  In thinking about my friendships, I suspected not but no one ever talks about problems with alcohol.  It's a secret shame and one that I have lived with for at least 10 years. I turned 50 in March and organised an 80's themed party for myself - complete with a DJ, drinks waiter, che

No longer alcohol dependant thanks to Naltrexone and the Sinclair Method.

Fourteen weeks ago I started on a journey to cure myself of alcohol dependency via a little known at home treatment using Naltrexone in conjunction with the Sinclair Method. When I say little known, that is to say it's little known in Australia but not in Finland where upwards of 77,000 Fins have been cured of alcoholism using the same method.   It's a safe and inexpensive treatment done in the privacy of your own home with many added bonusses...  Dignity is restored, shame is removed, the symptoms of depression and anxiety lift within a relatively short period. The short explanation of how the Sinclair Method works is NALTREXONE + DRINK = CURE but before you dive blindly into that there is more you need to be aware of.   Online support is invaluable.  You'll be warmly welcomed and greatly helped at Options Save Lives forum which is moderated by C Three Foundation. Online education is imperative.  Dispel the myths about Naltrexone and gain clear and concise

Am I cured of alcoholism already? ...or close to it?

The cravings have become less and less, so much so rhat it's hard to even pinpoint one and week 10 has ended without any desire to drink for the past 8 days. I can attribute much of my recent success with keeping my thirst quenched throughout the day.  Keeping a bottle of soda water (and a tasty sugar-free cordial) by my side while I work coupled with the insight I have gained over the last 10 weeks regarding the "habit" hidden underneath the addiction.  ...that robotic ritual of automatically pouring a drink to signal the end of the day and the start of the evening - the time of day when my thoughts turn to preparing the family meal. I refer to the timing of the underlying habit of mine as my "trigger point".  With the aid of Naltexone and TSM (the Sinclair Method), my brain is being retrained to learn that there is no reward gained and as a result of this water is just as "rewarding" as a glass of wine (and with some of the wines I've dru